# illa-builder vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 12 336 ✓ | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +59 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-octoprint