# illa-builder vs minecraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | illa-builder | minecraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 12 337 | 14 491 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +160 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

minecraft scores 78/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.

minecraft ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, minecraft is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

minecraft is growing faster right now (+160 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)
- [minecraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/minecraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/minecraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/illa-builder-vs-minecraft