# iipsrv vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | iipsrv | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 13 in Image Processing | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 326 | 132 669 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 312 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1461 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 52/100 for iipsrv, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for iipsrv.

If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; iipsrv needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [iipsrv](https://selfhost.directory/project/iipsrv) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/iipsrv.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/iipsrv-vs-llamacpp