# ifconfig.io vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ifconfig.io | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 20 in Network Utilities | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 606 | 61 541 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | HTML | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 48/100 for ifconfig.io, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ifconfig.io.

If you want the quickest setup, ifconfig.io is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ifconfig.io](https://selfhost.directory/project/ifconfigio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ifconfigio.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ifconfigio-vs-pi-hole