Hysteriavsnps
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hysteria | nps | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in Proxy | #2 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 22 764 | 34 264 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +31 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | app/v2.13.0 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Hysteria and nps score the same (74/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Hysteria ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nps.
If you want the quickest setup, Hysteria is easier to run; nps needs more configuration.
nps is growing faster right now (+31 stars in 30 days).
Hysteria details →nps details →
Swap a project
Keep Hysteria, compare it with
Keep nps, compare it with