# hypertrace vs Apache SkyWalking

> Two self-hosted [Application Performance Monitoring projects](https://selfhost.directory/application-performance-monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hypertrace | Apache SkyWalking |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 519 | 24 977 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 45/100 for hypertrace, so it is the safer default.

Apache SkyWalking ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hypertrace.

Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hypertrace](https://selfhost.directory/project/hypertrace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hypertrace.md)
- [Apache SkyWalking](https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/skywalking.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hypertrace-vs-skywalking