# hypertrace vs netdata

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hypertrace | netdata |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #4 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 519 | 81 200 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +566 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.12.2 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

netdata scores 87/100 against 45/100 for hypertrace, so it is the safer default.

netdata ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hypertrace.

If you want the quickest setup, netdata is easier to run; hypertrace needs more configuration.

netdata is growing faster right now (+566 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hypertrace](https://selfhost.directory/project/hypertrace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hypertrace.md)
- [netdata](https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/netdata.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Langfuse vs netdata](https://selfhost.directory/compare/langfuse-vs-netdata)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hypertrace-vs-netdata