# HyperSwitch vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 45 549 ✓ | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 638 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

HyperSwitch ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 638 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-workout-cool