# HyperSwitch vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 45 551 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 640 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 640 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-wbo