# HyperSwitch vs Traefik

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 45 511 | 65 400 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 681 ✓ | +459 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v2.11.60 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Traefik scores 87/100 against 81/100 for HyperSwitch, so it is the safer default.

Traefik ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.

If you want the quickest setup, Traefik is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 681 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Kong vs Traefik](https://selfhost.directory/compare/kong-vs-traefik)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-traefik