# HyperSwitch vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 45 532 ✓ | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 621 ✓ | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |

## Which one should you pick?

HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 78/100 for SRS, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 621 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-srs