# HyperSwitch vs ryot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | ryot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 45 536 ✓ | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 ✓ | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 ✓ | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [ryot](https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ryot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-ryot