# HyperSwitch vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 45 536 ✓ | 45 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 | +1 644 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 81/100 for HyperSwitch, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-reactive-resume