# HyperSwitch vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 45 510 | 65 374 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 680 ✓ | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

HyperSwitch and nocodb score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 680 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-nocodb