# HyperSwitch vs MedusaJs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HyperSwitch | MedusaJs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 45 510 ✓ | 36 990 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 680 ✓ | +550 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 81/100 for HyperSwitch, so it is the safer default.

MedusaJs ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.

HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 680 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HyperSwitch](https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hyperswitch.md)
- [MedusaJs](https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/medusajs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hyperswitch-vs-medusajs