hypermindvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hypermind | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in P2P | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 843 | 132 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +3 224 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1462 |
| Latest release | v1.0.1 · 20 Jan 2026 | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 53/100 for hypermind, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for hypermind.
If you want the quickest setup, hypermind is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 224 stars in 30 days).
hypermind details →llama.cpp details →