# Huly vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huly | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 45 in Project Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 28 012 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +240 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.426 · 2 Jul 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | EPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Huly scores 74/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Huly.

Huly is growing faster right now (+240 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huly](https://selfhost.directory/project/huly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huly.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huly-vs-tube-archivist