Huginnvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 50 168 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +178 | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+178 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with