# Huginn vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 50 167 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +177 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

Huginn is growing faster right now (+177 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s