# Huginn vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 50 165 ✓ | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +181 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-workout-cool