# Huginn vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 50 165 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +181 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.

If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Huginn is growing faster right now (+181 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-windows-arm