# Huginn vs Wazuh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | Wazuh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 50 166 ✓ | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +182 | +493 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.14.9 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn and Wazuh score the same (80/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; Wazuh needs more configuration.

Wazuh is growing faster right now (+493 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [Wazuh](https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wazuh.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-wazuh