HuginnvsWakupator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | Wakupator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #11 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 50 168 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +178 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.2.0 · 6 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | C |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 43/100 for Wakupator, so it is the safer default.
Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wakupator.
If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; Wakupator needs more configuration.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+178 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →Wakupator details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep Wakupator, compare it with