# Huginn vs url-to-png

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | url-to-png |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #13 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 50 164 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +180 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.4 · 18 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 49/100 for url-to-png, so it is the safer default.

Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for url-to-png.

If you want the quickest setup, url-to-png is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.

Huginn is growing faster right now (+180 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [url-to-png](https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/url-to-png.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-url-to-png