# Huginn vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 50 177 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.

If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

Huginn is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-typetype