HuginnvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 50 177 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +187 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.
If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →TypeType details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep TypeType, compare it with