# Huginn vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 50 174 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +184 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

Huginn is growing faster right now (+184 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-tube-archivist