# Huginn vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 50 165 ✓ | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +181 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.

Huginn is growing faster right now (+181 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-transfersh