# Huginn vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 50 164 | 117 655 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +180 | +5 296 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for Huginn, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-tradingagents