# Huginn vs Obscura

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Huginn | Obscura |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 50 164 ✓ | 29 526 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +180 | +442 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Huginn scores 80/100 against 75/100 for Obscura, so it is the safer default.

Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.

Obscura is growing faster right now (+442 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/huginn.md)
- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Activepieces vs Huginn](https://selfhost.directory/compare/activepieces-vs-huginn)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/huginn-vs-obscura