# houndarr vs MeTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | houndarr | MeTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #54 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 304 | 15 125 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 48 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.13.3 · 19 Sept 2026 | 2026.10.27 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

MeTube scores 76/100 against 53/100 for houndarr, so it is the safer default.

MeTube ships more often: 48 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for houndarr.

MeTube is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [houndarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/houndarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/houndarr.md)
- [MeTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/metube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/houndarr-vs-metube