# hothost vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring-observability), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hothost | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #80 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 181 | 6 519 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 44/100 for hothost, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, hothost is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

Zabbix is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hothost](https://selfhost.directory/project/hothost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hothost.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hothost-vs-zabbix