# hothost vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hothost | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #80 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 181 | 35 299 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +528 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 44/100 for hothost, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hothost.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+528 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hothost](https://selfhost.directory/project/hothost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hothost.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hothost-vs-qdrant