# hot-updater vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hot-updater | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 20 in Application Management | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 1 798 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 47 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.1.4 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 62/100 for hot-updater, so it is the safer default.

hot-updater ships more often: 47 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

hot-updater is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hot-updater](https://selfhost.directory/project/hot-updater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hot-updater.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hot-updater-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s