# hot-updater vs Payload CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hot-updater | Payload CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 20 in Application Management | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS |
| GitHub stars | 1 799 | 45 563 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +651 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 47 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.1.4 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 62/100 for hot-updater, so it is the safer default.

hot-updater ships more often: 47 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Payload CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Payload CMS is easier to run; hot-updater needs more configuration.

Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+651 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hot-updater](https://selfhost.directory/project/hot-updater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hot-updater.md)
- [Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/payload-cms.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ghost vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-payload-cms)
- [directus vs Payload CMS](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-payload-cms)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hot-updater-vs-payload-cms