# hosting vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

Zigbee2MQTT is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-zigbee2mqtt