# hosting vs ZeroNet

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | ZeroNet |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 18 786 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ZeroNet scores 63/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ZeroNet is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

ZeroNet is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [ZeroNet](https://selfhost.directory/project/zeronet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zeronet.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-zeronet