hostingvsWeb Rendering Proxy (WRP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #11 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | 4.10.3 · 23 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) scores 53/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
hosting details →Web Rendering Proxy (WRP) details →