# hosting vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 52/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 196 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

WPS Office scores 52/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, WPS Office is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-wps-office