# hosting vs WeTTY

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | WeTTY |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #7 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 5 478 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +29 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.2.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

WeTTY scores 68/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

WeTTY ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, WeTTY is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

WeTTY is growing faster right now (+29 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [WeTTY](https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wetty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-wetty