# hosting vs Virtual Radar Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Virtual Radar Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 49/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #6 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 315 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Virtual Radar Server scores 49/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Virtual Radar Server is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Virtual Radar Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/virtual-radar-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/virtual-radar-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-virtual-radar-server