# hosting vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 718 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +6 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

UUSEC WAF is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-uusec-waf