# hosting vs usque

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | usque |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 53/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #29 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 505 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.2.1 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

usque scores 53/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

usque ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, usque is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [usque](https://selfhost.directory/project/usque) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/usque.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-usque