# hosting vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 628 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +25 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uMap scores 64/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, uMap is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

uMap is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-umap