# hosting vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 48/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 471 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

TypeType scores 48/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-typetype