# hosting vs txtdot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | txtdot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 47/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 213 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

txtdot scores 47/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

txtdot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [txtdot](https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-txtdot