# hosting vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-tradingagents