# hosting vs tapflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | tapflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 55/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 377 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +7 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

tapflow scores 55/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, tapflow is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

tapflow is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [tapflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tapflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-tapflow