hostingvstapflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | tapflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 10 in Testing |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.30.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
tapflow scores 55/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
tapflow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, tapflow is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
tapflow is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →tapflow details →