# hosting vs taOS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | taOS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 49/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #104 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 582 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | bundle-latest · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

taOS scores 49/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

taOS ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, taOS is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [taOS](https://selfhost.directory/project/taos) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/taos.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-taos